The value of your IP is usually directly related to the extent to which the owner of the intellectual property an enforce these rights. Effective trade mark enforcement is necessary to maintain the value of your IP in legal terms and to provide an ongoing deterrent to infringement by any third parties.
Speak with an expert IP attorney today.
Another party could be benefiting from your brand and reputation by using a sign as a trade mark that is substantially identical or deceptively similar to your trade mark. Trade mark enforcement against parties infringing your own registered mark can be addressed either in or out of the courts. In order to establish legal action against a potential infringer, you will need to prove the validity of your IP rights by providing evidence of the following:
1. That your trade mark is registered and in force. Intellectual property rights have expiry dates and in the case of trade marks, the registration needs to be kept up to date. Moreover, the trade mark should be in activel use in trade.
2. That you are the owner of the trade mark.
3. That another party is infringing your trade mark rights. This must be established as if proven groundless, the plaintiff in a trade mark infringement cases can be ordered by the courts to pay the costs incurred by the accused party.
4. That the infringing party does not have authority to use your trade mark.
Subject to any agreement between the owner of a registered trade mark and an authorised user of the trade mark, the authorised user may bring an action for infringement of the trade mark:
1. at any time, with the consent of the registered owner; or
2. during the prescribed period, if the registered owner refuses to bring such an action on a particular occasion during the prescribed period; or
3. after the end of the prescribed period, if the registered owner has failed to bring such an action during the prescribed period.
If the authorised user brings an action for infringement of the trade mark, the authorised user must make the registered owner of the trade mark a defendant in the action. However, the registered owner is not liable for costs where they do not participate in the proceedings.
The Trade Marks Act provides protection for registered trade marks. Establishing registration is straightforward because a registered trade mark will be entered into the Register of Trade Marks.
While it is often more difficult to prove and more costly, some protection is accorded to unregistered trade marks. The tort of passing off and consumer protection legislation provide avenues for business owners to protect their trade marks from unauthorised use.
In the Common Law tort of passing off, a party makes unauthorised use of a get-up, namely, the overall packaging, external appearance, or feel of a product, to profit from another product's established reputation. Registration of a trade mark is not necessary in passing off cases. The elements of passing off are more difficult to establish and generally require:
1.The establishment of a reputation or goodwill,
2.That there has been a misrepresentation that good/services of one trader are connected with the goods/services of another trader, and
3.That there has been damage to (the Plaintiff's) goodwill.
Passing off and trade mark infringement cases frequently overlap but are addressed using different approaches. Compared with infringement, passing off is not covered in any statutory sanction, and is instead ruled based on precedent cases tried in the pertinent courts.
A successful passing off claim can result in an injunction with the possibility of the court also awarding damages in some cases.
In addition to the above defences, Section 124 of the Act states that infringement is not established when your unregistered trade mark relating to goods and services in question has been used continuously before the filing date (priority date) of the infringed trade mark or the first time that the infringing party or their predecessor started using their unregistered trade mark, whichever is earlier.
It is common to see cases where there is an overlap of passing-off and misleading and deceptive conduct. Since the actions can be related and often also overlap with claims of trade mark infringement, it will be always advisable to have an IP specialist lawyer analyse your situation.
In addition to the above defences, Section 124 of the Act states that infringement is not established when your unregistered trade mark relating to goods and services in question has been used continuously before the filing date (priority date) of the infringed trade mark or the first time that the infringing party or their predecessor started using their unregistered trade mark, whichever is earlier.
Court proceedings can be quite costly and therefore, settling disputes outside of court is almost always preferable. Once aware of instances of unauthorized use of a registered Trade Mark, it is usual practice for the trade mark attorney to send a "letter of demand" to the infringing party. The letter of demand can be prepared in a number of ways depending on the objective of the Trade Mark owner. This is a pre-condition to commencing litigation in the Federal Court.
Mediation and arbitration may be employed so that both parties can come to a mutual agreement before the issue is escalated to litigation.
Trade mark registration will protect your brand and by association, any reputation that you build under the brand name. It has a value that grows alongside of your business. If you are considering trade mark protection or enforcing your trade mark rights against a potential infringer, please do contact us for advice and guidance on how best to approach the matter.
Speak to an IP attorney