<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Baxter IP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baxterip.com.au/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au</link>
	<description>Patent &#38; Trade Mark Attorneys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 04:10:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Important Patent Legislation Changes in Australia Effective 15 April 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/important-patent-legislation-changes-in-australia-effective-15-april-2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/important-patent-legislation-changes-in-australia-effective-15-april-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 01:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Australian Parliament recently passed the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (“Raising the Bar”) Act 2012 (“the Act”), which received Royal Assent on 15 April 2012.  The Patent legislation changes will come into effect on 15 April 2013.  The changes will implement stricter patentability and specification requirements for patent applications. &#160; Which applications are affected? The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/important-patent-legislation-changes-in-australia-effective-15-april-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t be clotheslined by the “Raising the Bar” Bill when filing divisional applications</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/don%e2%80%99t-be-clotheslined-by-the-%e2%80%9craising-the-bar%e2%80%9d-bill-when-filing-divisional-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/don%e2%80%99t-be-clotheslined-by-the-%e2%80%9craising-the-bar%e2%80%9d-bill-when-filing-divisional-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 03:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Raising the Bar Bill&#8221;, introduced on 22 June 2011, attempts to support innovation in Australia. One aspect, addressed by Schedule 3 of the Bill, seeks to reduce the abuse drawing out patent applications by filing a ‘daisy chain’ of divisional applications. Specifically, it is currently possible to file a divisional application up until the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/don%e2%80%99t-be-clotheslined-by-the-%e2%80%9craising-the-bar%e2%80%9d-bill-when-filing-divisional-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP Commercialisation and Spin out Summit 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/ip-commercialisation-and-spin-out-summit-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/ip-commercialisation-and-spin-out-summit-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 05:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fidel Dela Paz, associate of Baxter IP, will be presenting in the upcoming IP Commercialisation and Spin out Summit 2012.  Fidel will be examining the upcoming patent and trade mark law changes brought by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Bill 2011,  and how the changes may affect commercialisation in Australia.   In particular, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/ip-commercialisation-and-spin-out-summit-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>REVEALED: Samsung OZ Tab Stockpiles Ready To Go</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/revealed-samsung-oz-tab-stockpiles-ready-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/revealed-samsung-oz-tab-stockpiles-ready-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 05:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reidy, O. (01/12/2011). REVEALED: Samsung OZ Tab Stockpiles Ready To Go. SmartHouse.com.au. Retrieved from http://smarthouse.com.au/Home_Office/Notebooks_And_Tablets/K3E6H8V7?page=1 Samsung are loading artillery of the Android running Galaxy 10.1 to Australia, according to sources. And hoping to blow iPad 2 out of the water, unless Apple makes a final attempt to block its arch rival, once again. The Koreans [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/revealed-samsung-oz-tab-stockpiles-ready-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Patent Law and Practice</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/chinese-patent-law-practice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/chinese-patent-law-practice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 04:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November 2011, Chris visited patent attorney firms in Guangzhou Baxter IP works with and to learn more about Chinese patent law and practice. Here are his notes! Chinese Invention Patents (Analogous to Australian Standard Patents): They have a 6 month grace period for disclosure of an invention at a recognised exhibition or by a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/chinese-patent-law-practice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do you need an Intellectual Property Attorney</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/why-do-you-need-an-intellectual-property-attorney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/why-do-you-need-an-intellectual-property-attorney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 05:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proper preparation of a patent specification is probably the most important part of any patent application process. The patent specification must not only meet certain substantive requirements such as fully describing the invention but also certain formal requirements including those relating to the format of the specification, the required sections, number of claims and so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/why-do-you-need-an-intellectual-property-attorney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP Commercialisation and Spin out Summit 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/ip-commercialisation-spin-out-summit-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/ip-commercialisation-spin-out-summit-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of our Senior Attorneys, Fidel Dela Paz, has been invited to present at the IP Commercialisation and Spin out Summit 2012.  The conference will focus on driving successful commercialisation of Intellectual Property using best practice business frameworks.  Among the topics to be discussed include examining the interrelationship between research and development (R&#38;D) and commercialisation, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/ip-commercialisation-spin-out-summit-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baxter IP’s Unique Approach to Drafting Provisional Patent Specifications</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/baxter-ip%e2%80%99s-unique-approach-to-drafting-provisional-patent-specifications/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/baxter-ip%e2%80%99s-unique-approach-to-drafting-provisional-patent-specifications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the key roles of a provisional patent application is the establishment of a priority date, which is the patentee’s earliest claimed filing date for his patent.  The provisional application allows the applicant to file a subsequent complete patent application within 12 months of the filing date of the provisional application, with the complete [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/baxter-ip%e2%80%99s-unique-approach-to-drafting-provisional-patent-specifications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Zealand Patent Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/new-zealand-patent-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/new-zealand-patent-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 23:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Zealand Patent Bill, which is scheduled to replace the Patents Act 1953, is due to be brought into force by 31 December 2012. The new Patent Bill is essentially a hybrid of the current Australian and United Kingdom legislation, and has been designed to being New Zealand patent law more into line with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/new-zealand-patent-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research &amp; Development Tax Reform Briefing with Baxter IP &amp; KPMG</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/research-development-tax-reform-briefing-with-baxter-ip-kpmg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/research-development-tax-reform-briefing-with-baxter-ip-kpmg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 23:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 24 October 2011 Baxter IP Patent Attorneys held a briefing for its clients in collaboration with KPMG on the new tax reform incentives for business conducting R&#38;D activities. The briefing was delivered by Paul Van Bergen from KPMG and provided an insightful commentary into the current incentives available, and how business can access them. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/research-development-tax-reform-briefing-with-baxter-ip-kpmg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNBC Interviews Chris Baxter on the Apple Samsung Patent Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/cnbc-interview%e2%80%99s-chris-baxter-on-the-apple-samsung-patent-wars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/cnbc-interview%e2%80%99s-chris-baxter-on-the-apple-samsung-patent-wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=1603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris has released his preparation notes for the interview below: What is this Apple Samsung patent war all about? Apple has taken action against Samsung in a number of countries for patent infringement relating to Apple patents covering its touch screen and the hand gestures which control it, and claims that Samsung “slavishly” copied its [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/cnbc-interview%e2%80%99s-chris-baxter-on-the-apple-samsung-patent-wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian Patent Office Practice narrows the scope for software related inventions</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/australian-patent-office-practice-narrows-the-scope-for-software-related-inventions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/australian-patent-office-practice-narrows-the-scope-for-software-related-inventions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[About Baxter IP Patent Attorneys Sydney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australian Patent Office Practice narrows the scope for software related inventions A recent shift in the examination practice of the Australian Patent Office may result in certain software related application being rejected for not being patentable. Generally, Australian Patent Law shows an aversion to ‘pure’ business methods, working directions, mere instructions and the like; these [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/australian-patent-office-practice-narrows-the-scope-for-software-related-inventions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Streamlined Process for Trans-Tasman Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/streamlined-process-for-trans-tasman-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/streamlined-process-for-trans-tasman-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[About Baxter IP Patent Attorneys Sydney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Streamlined Process for Trans-Tasman Patents In a recent announcement1, IP Australia and the Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand (“IPONZ”) have agreed on an implementation plan to introduce a streamlined patent process that will allow a unitary patent application process for both countries by early 2013, and a unitary patent examination process by June 2014. Both [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/streamlined-process-for-trans-tasman-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case study: Baxter IP Patent Attorneys helps to successfully protect railway sled invention</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/case-study-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-helps-to-successfully-protect-railway-sled-invention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/case-study-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-helps-to-successfully-protect-railway-sled-invention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Case study: Baxter IP Patent Attorneys helps to successfully protect railway sled invention The Australian Rail Track Corporation has fast tracked a major maintenance program to prevent one of Australia’s busiest railway tracks from subsuming into mud, using a technology subject to one or more patent applications prepared by Baxter IP Patent attorneys. As reported [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/case-study-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-helps-to-successfully-protect-railway-sled-invention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian &amp; New Zealand Single Regulatory Framework For Patent Attorney Profession</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/australian-new-zealand-single-regulatory-framework-for-patent-attorney-profession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/australian-new-zealand-single-regulatory-framework-for-patent-attorney-profession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australian &#38; New Zealand Single Regulatory Framework For Patent Attorney Profession The Australian patent attorney profession is currently regulated by the Professional Standards Board for Patent Attorneys. A reform is currently being proposed by IP Australia that would see the establishment of a single Trans-Tasman Governance Body with responsibility for patent attorney eduction &#38; regulation. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/australian-new-zealand-single-regulatory-framework-for-patent-attorney-profession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Does An Exclusive Licensee Have Standing To Sue For Infringement? Patent Attorney Answers&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/when-does-an-exclusive-licensee-have-standing-to-sue-for-infringement-patent-attorney-answers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/when-does-an-exclusive-licensee-have-standing-to-sue-for-infringement-patent-attorney-answers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Does An Exclusive Licensee Have Standing To Sue For Infringement? Patent Attorney Answers&#8230; Our patent attorneys have been asked a number of times by foreign associate attorneys as to whether an exclusive licensee need have exclusive rights in a patent in order to have standing to sue to protect those rights against infringement by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/when-does-an-exclusive-licensee-have-standing-to-sue-for-infringement-patent-attorney-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Attorney on Developments in Patent Enforcement In China</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorney-on-developments-in-patent-enforcement-in-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorney-on-developments-in-patent-enforcement-in-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patent Attorney on Developments in Patent Enforcement In China Tuesday, March 08, 2011 In late 2010, the Chinese government launched a new national campaign to crack down on violations of intellectual property rights (IPRs) and on the production and distribution of fake and shoddy products. In particular, the campaign is directed towards targeting pirated publications, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorney-on-developments-in-patent-enforcement-in-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Attorneys&#8217; New Uses For Innovation Patents</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorneys-new-uses-for-innovation-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorneys-new-uses-for-innovation-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patent Attorneys&#8217; New Uses For Innovation Patents From 1994 to 2000, Dr John Baxter was a Member of the Advisory Council on Industrial Property (ACIP) for IP Australia. ACIP played a key role in the development of the Australian Innovation Patent system which was launched in 2001. Up to this stage there was no &#8220;second [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorneys-new-uses-for-innovation-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Baxter IP Patent Attorneys Presenting at Microsoft BizSpark Program</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-presenting-at-microsoft-bizspark-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-presenting-at-microsoft-bizspark-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 02:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baxter IP Patent Attorneys Presenting at Microsoft BizSpark Program Monday, November 08, 2010 Patent attorneys Chris Baxter &#38; Nicholas Milne will be presenting at the Microsoft BizSpark program on 11 Nov 2010 on the patentability of software in the United States, Europe, Japan, China, Korea and Australia and providing advice and insights to the program [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-presenting-at-microsoft-bizspark-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1-Click Computer Implemented Business Method Patent Allowed In Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/1-click-computer-implemented-business-method-patent-allowed-in-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/1-click-computer-implemented-business-method-patent-allowed-in-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1-Click Computer Implemented Business Method Patent Allowed In Canada In a recent development, a Canadian federal court has ruled in favour of Amazon.com Inc. allowing them to patent their “one-click” order process for online shopping. &#160; The online retail giant has been in a legal battle for 12 years seeking to patent a single-click ordering [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/1-click-computer-implemented-business-method-patent-allowed-in-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Attorneys Watch Carefully As Uniloc Fights Again</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorneys-watch-carefully-as-uniloc-fights-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorneys-watch-carefully-as-uniloc-fights-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 01:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patent Attorneys Watch Carefully As Uniloc Fights Again Uniloc, a software company specialising in IT security and piracy protection, was brought to the international spotlight with its lawsuit against Microsoft for infringing its patent relating to product activation technology in 2003. Subsequently, Uniloc won a $US388 million jury verdict which found Microsoft was in violation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorneys-watch-carefully-as-uniloc-fights-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AFP cracks down on organised counterfeiting – victory for IP rights owners and patent attorneys</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/afp-cracks-down-on-organised-counterfeiting-%e2%80%93-victory-for-ip-rights-owners-and-patent-attorneys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/afp-cracks-down-on-organised-counterfeiting-%e2%80%93-victory-for-ip-rights-owners-and-patent-attorneys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 01:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AFP cracks down on organised counterfeiting – victory for IP rights owners and patent attorneys In a statement issued by the Australian Federal Police (AFP), it was announced that during the week commencing 13th Sept, 21 warrants were executed across Australia in relation to the organised selling and distribution of counterfeit and pirated goods including [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/afp-cracks-down-on-organised-counterfeiting-%e2%80%93-victory-for-ip-rights-owners-and-patent-attorneys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent attorneys are often asked about the difference between copyright &amp; patents?</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorneys-are-often-asked-about-the-difference-between-copyright-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorneys-are-often-asked-about-the-difference-between-copyright-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 01:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patent attorneys are often asked about the difference between copyright &#38; patents? Inventors often ask our patent attorneys, &#8220;How can I copyright my idea?&#8221;. We answer, &#8220;Do you mean patent your idea?&#8221;. There is a distinct difference between what copyright and patents can be used to protect. See our new FAQ on this subject - What [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/patent-attorneys-are-often-asked-about-the-difference-between-copyright-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the difference between a patent attorney and a patent lawyer?</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/what-is-the-difference-between-a-patent-attorney-and-a-patent-lawyer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/what-is-the-difference-between-a-patent-attorney-and-a-patent-lawyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 01:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the difference between a patent attorney and a patent lawyer? In Australia, new inventors often confuse the role of a patent attorney and a patent lawyer. If you are not sure about the difference between a patent attorney and a lawyer, find out here - What is the difference between patent attorneys and patent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/what-is-the-difference-between-a-patent-attorney-and-a-patent-lawyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bilski 2010 &#8211; The case every patent attorney has been waiting for</title>
		<link>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/bilski-2010-the-case-every-patent-attorney-has-been-waiting-for/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/bilski-2010-the-case-every-patent-attorney-has-been-waiting-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent Attorney News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baxterip.com.au/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bilski 2010 &#8211; The case every patent attorney has been waiting for Bilski 2010 &#8211; The case every patent attorney has been waiting for Synopsis Bilski v. Kappos &#8211; 28 Jun 2010 The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari on June 1, 2009 In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. Cir. 2008) and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baxterip.com.au/about-baxter-ip-patent-attorneys-sydney/patent-attorney-news/bilski-2010-the-case-every-patent-attorney-has-been-waiting-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

